Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login

I think the next world conflict will be in: 

45%
77 deviants said 1 year or less
22%
38 deviants said 2 years
14%
24 deviants said 5 years
6%
11 deviants said more then ten years
6%
11 deviants said never
6%
10 deviants said 10 years

Devious Comments

:iconwescoast:
Wescoast Featured By Owner Jul 25, 2006  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I honestly think the next WWIII will be everyone against the United States. I love this country but I don't condone what were doing around the world. We're no longer in the Transatlantic Union, we were the only nation to not be in the ICC, and we rationalized invading Iraq on the pretense of throwing out an evil dictator but we won't go into Darfur and we did nothing in Rwanda. We need cooperative leaders who want justice and democracy more than a couple of greenbacks. We need a Bullworth.
Reply
:iconm-a-k-a:
m-a-k-a Featured By Owner Jul 23, 2006
oh and i voted for 2 yrs.
Reply
:iconm-a-k-a:
m-a-k-a Featured By Owner Jul 23, 2006
My people are dying, an 80% of the israeli puplic are supporting what they're doing.

i see this now as Moshe Katsav told Bush to hold his jacket and let him go at it with lebanon.


yet when hizbollah strikes, they blaim syria and iran for weapon support.
what about america supporting isreal with the weapons.....

are we trying to forget what isreal did to the palastinian And lebanese people for over 25 yrs?

there was no such thing of a "hizbollah" till isreal went ahead and went baised and over dominant to lebanon

how can hizbollah be the problem of lebanon, when this yr it was going to be lebanon's best tourist attraction in any yrs has been past for them.

if you read between the lines, you will figure alot of shit out, and to the point where you wish to not find out any further.
Reply
:iconnkyc:
NKYC Featured By Owner Jul 22, 2006  Professional Photographer
definitely less than a year, freaking bush will start it :ambulance:
Reply
:iconrone1one:
rone1one Featured By Owner Jul 20, 2006
pai io sper sa nu fie niciunul.....dsau am putea cu totzi sa le aratam manelistilor cat d mul ii indragim noi....[link]
Ninja Battle!.....:| i hope
Reply
:iconbeaucoupzero:
beaucoupzero Featured By Owner Jul 22, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
Reply
:iconsuckup:
suckup Featured By Owner Jul 19, 2006
i miss the "right now in middle east" option!
Reply
:iconbeaucoupzero:
beaucoupzero Featured By Owner Jul 19, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
hahaha
Reply
:iconpandora-inthesky:
Pandora-intheSKY Featured By Owner Jul 19, 2006   General Artist
Most ominous poll:)
Reply
:icongulak:
gulak Featured By Owner Jul 19, 2006
we live in a constant conflict..didn you already noticed that?
Reply
:iconacidophill:
acidophill Featured By Owner Jul 19, 2006  Student
always ! : )
Reply
:iconmatthewmorse:
MatthewMorse Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
I have no clue when it's going to start, (probably not very soon because most of the wars right now other than the war in Iraq with the involvement of the US, are more religious than anything else) but i've got my money on Israel. They have the best Air Force in the world. And they'll kick all of our asses.

P.S. The United States is not to blame for what goes on in the Middle East. Dumbass. Most of what goes on in the Middle East has been going on for 2000 years. Since before the birth of the United States. And it's mostly because there are radicals that believe their religious books are telling them to kill everyone that isn't their religion. It's not even the people's fault. There are millions of innocent people over there caught in a religous war brought about by a few tyrants that have drilled this destruction into a bunch of idiots and now they have to spread that death and destruction all over the flipping planet.

Most religious books are very peaceful books. Leave it to the radicals to screw it all up. Crazy asses.

And now the US will go in and stop it. As usual. And gas will keep rising. And taxes will go up. And welfare-ees will still get free groceries. I want free groceries. Dang.
Reply
:iconbeaucoupzero:
beaucoupzero Featured By Owner Jul 19, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
i totaly agree
Reply
:iconmatthewmorse:
MatthewMorse Featured By Owner Jul 19, 2006
Glad someone does...
Reply
:iconkiservonelpaso:
Kiservonelpaso Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
there's always going to be conflict, and we should't act surprised if anymore arise. it is inevitable
Reply
:iconarandomdreamer:
ARandomDreamer Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
The whole world's going to hell in a handbasket. >.> And, sadly enough much of the problems now wouldn't have arisen if not for the United States.
Reply
:iconkamikaze0:
kamikaze0 Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
can you be more specific about how the U.S. is to blame for a majority of the world's problems?
Reply
:iconarandomdreamer:
ARandomDreamer Featured By Owner Jul 19, 2006
I wouldn't say the majority, per se, but I can think of quite a few... like how we're fighting and killing many people in the Middle East for money is one of the main reasons. We attacked Iraq, a place where there were few terrorists, and the two places we should've gone if we'd invaded -- Syria and Saudi Arabia -- we didn't, because we get too much money from them. We sold Pakistan, a country fighting with India, nuclear weapons as long as they promised not to use them against India. >.> So, now that we've been fighting pointless wars for years now, we don't have enough troops. So we won't be prepared if North Korea attacks, and we wouldn't be prepared to assist Israel or Lebanon if the fighting escalated badly.
... I may be mistaken about some of this, though. I stopped following the new closely a while ago.
Reply
:iconskinnypup:
skinnypup Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
Hm, well if by world conflict you mean something like WW3, then i don't see it any time soon. Maybe in 50 or 100 years from now (when, on the other hand, i won't even care about wars and such) if the world will look completely different (politically speaking).
Today there are no two sides for a global conflict. I mean we don't have a bipolar world setup like during WW1, WW2 or The Cold War ("world wars are like so last year" :) ).Also there are no big oposing alliances like in the past. No one can stand up to the US: France&Germany (and the rest of the EU) are all talk, Russia isn't what it once was, and countries like Iran, Siria etc will share the fate of Irak if Bush decides he "don't like them arabs". But, on the other hand, the Irak invasion/liberation (which either one you like) was really expensive so i don;t see the boys in blue going to war in the near future.
Local wars like Israel-Lebanon (actually Hezbollah - if that;s how it's spelled) will happen in the future like they always have.
Reply
:iconbeaucoupzero:
beaucoupzero Featured By Owner Jul 22, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
man but the world is split in half the ones that have money and the ones that don t have shit
Reply
:iconb1indy:
B1indy Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Professional Filmographer
i dont want a fallout :[
Reply
:iconzed29:
zed29 Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
"world conflict"...more than ten years. civil wars and so on....lessa than 1 year
Reply
:iconvelcrogoblin:
VelcroGoblin Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
the next world conflit will be in about 2 seconds. and the next 2 seconds, and the next and the next and the next and the next and the next and the next and the next and the next and the next andthenextandthenextandthenextandhtenext andhtenextandthenext andthenextandthenext.

and i keep hoping that the next will be the end of mother earth's suffering. the trees should eat us.
Reply
:iconcardinalcdxx:
CardinalCDXX Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
People are rather pessimist. When you say WORLD CONFLICT, I anticipate WWIII. In which case not for another hundred years, after the degradation of many governments, because world leaders are smart/self-interested enough to not get into wars they have no business in.

They much rather profit off the backs of both warring countries.

?eace
Reply
:iconevilmishie:
evilmishie Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
:/ There has been a lot of mounting tension lately. And that is just pretty sad. Nobody wants to give in. Right now there are a lot of conflicts in a lot of areas of the world (uh did we forget about Darfur already...), and with the Israeli-Lebanon conflict/war-thing, I think more people are realising that the world is going crazier every minute. I mean, every time you open up a newspaper, there's war staring right at you in the face. The tough job of a leader is choosing between staying out of it or going in to help solve it--you get criticised either way. On one hand, you can let it go and hope the problem resolves itself internally, and people say you are completely insensitive to other countries' problems. On the other hand, you butt in, people say you stick your heads in too many places, and you risk a global war. ):

I wonder what would happen if every country decided to go on an isolationist policy. Maybe just for a while...
Reply
:iconvive-le-rock:
Vive-Le-Rock Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Student General Artist
i see most people are convinced that it'll be in a year or less.. and i am too. then it depends on what people mean by WORLD conflict... i seriously don't understand why so many people listen to the assholes in charge!!
Reply
:iconpaperwhale:
PaperWhale Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Hobbyist Digital Artist
its gonna be so gay if theres ww3, it might be soon. 1-2 years
Reply
:icontigereyey3k:
tigereyeY3K Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
What, no 'any minute now' option? :P
Reply
:iconsmirapdesigns:
SmirapDesigns Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
Let's just hope Iran doesn't get involved in this, or else things will get much worse...
i mean really bad.
Reply
:iconbeaucoupzero:
beaucoupzero Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
i don t think they stand a chance man
Reply
:iconsmirapdesigns:
SmirapDesigns Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
It's not that, i just think that if Iran get's involved ( apart from the fact that they have nuclear weapons wich i don't think they're stupid to use) then usa will get involved. After that who knows what else would happen. But personally i think this conflict is gonna end soon, at least for now... i don't think it's time yet.
Reply
:icongameornot:
gameornot Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
it's probably be right before the next election so bush will try and pull some sort of stunt that allows him to stay in office and have us all kill ourselves.....anyway
Reply
:iconkamikaze0:
kamikaze0 Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
the next world conflict has already started whether people realize it or not.
Reply
:iconchocolatechopstick:
chocolatechopstick Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
bullshits fight against the controls and restrict which serve the same system of power.and not just money..it comes from everwhere ..as fckin time
Reply
:iconbeaucoupzero:
beaucoupzero Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
money sweetie money...
Reply
:iconviremaster:
viremaster Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Hobbyist Digital Artist
i give 5 years,..
Reply
:iconnulltrax:
nulltrax Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
after b*sh is out, hopefully never again. :|
Reply
:iconthyia:
Thyia Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Hobbyist General Artist
Nope never nada zilch

After WW-II people are far too scared. =p And moreever it would be a blow to economies .
Reply
:iconbeaucoupzero:
beaucoupzero Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
economies tend to rely on war....take the krupp family for example they helped the rising of the first reich and the second.they made weapons and weapons is history`s most profitable business.
Reply
:iconthyia:
Thyia Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Hobbyist General Artist
Hahaha quite right.Indeed weapons are.

Well in the present world, majority of the nations are either under developed or developing, and most of asia pacific and eurasia, is still trying to catch up with the rest of the world.Expecting them to join in the fracas, is impossible.

More ever, considering the fact that, govts. are aiming for NPT..is against wars.Then again it, would be utter stupidity, to destroy the "hard work" that that major powers have done to achieve peace. =p
Reply
:iconshokubo:
Shokubo Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
Guess the lebanon-Israel is already it. It will go worse, much worse i gess.
Reply
:iconmesko:
Mesko Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Hobbyist General Artist
Two years, if you don't count the Israel - Libanon thing. That has already started, and may stirr up some shit. :/
Reply
:iconcalliope00:
Calliope00 Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
i've been optimist, voted 2 years :no:
if we go on this way... it could be even earlier.

*cosmic pessimism*
Reply
:iconbeaucoupzero:
beaucoupzero Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
i wonder what will happen to dA if u right...
Reply
:iconcalliope00:
Calliope00 Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
mmm that's my latest worry... i think it will go on existing, maybe the net will be the only peaceful place
Reply
:iconredmisfit:
RedMisfit Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006   Digital Artist
less than a year, this Israel thing is getting way out of hand already, just a matter of time, shame we live in such a violent world :(
Reply
:iconbeaucoupzero:
beaucoupzero Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
a big shame my friend...still i try to see it as the dawn of mankind
Reply
:iconquintor-vol-1:
QuinTor-Vol-1 Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
tomorrow
Reply
:iconbeaucoupzero:
beaucoupzero Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
*hides*
Reply
:iconteh-chix0r:
Teh-cHix0r Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2006
iete acuma da in clocot
Reply
Add a Comment:
 

Poll History